Ishaque Eqbal vs Gray Voelzke Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 15 Jul at 09:04 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
I. Eqbal vs G. Voelzke

IND
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Eqbal 1 - 0 Voelzke
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ishaque Eqbal winning 2 and Gray Voelzke winning 0. The last match between Ishaque Eqbal and Gray Voelzke was at the M15 Hillcrest, 15-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Ishaque Eqbal getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Eqbal | 1 |
| Voelzke | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Hillcrest(07-15-25)
I. Eqbal vs G. Voelzke H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 54.07% (93-79) | Career Total W/L | 31.58% (12-26) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
I. Eqbal vs G. Voelzke Match Preview:
- In recent months, Eqbal slightly edges out Voelzke in second serve performance, winning 40.16% of points compared to Voelzke's 39.55%. Could this small advantage impact the match's outcome? It certainly might contribute.
- Voelzke showcases a stronger return game compared to Eqbal in recent form, winning 49.71% of points on opponents' second serves versus Eqbal's 46.98%.
- Regarding first serve returns, Voelzke again demonstrates superiority with a 27.64% success rate, while Eqbal stands at 25.06%.
- Under pressure, Eqbal has been more resilient, saving 48.8% of breakpoints, compared to Voelzke's 46.3%.
- Eqbal's overall match win percentage over the past year is notably higher at 53.13%, while Voelzke has won just 30% of matches.
- Both players favor hard courts; however, Eqbal has a more impressive win percentage on this surface at 55%, whereas Voelzke falls behind at 40%.
- Despite both competing mostly at the $10K level tournaments, Eqbal has a more successful record, winning 53.13% of matches compared to Voelzke's 30%.
- Quality of opponents differs significantly as Voelzke has faced higher-ranked players, with an average rank of 57.55, whereas Eqbal's opponents averaged a rank of 217.
- Should the match extend to a deciding set, Eqbal has a considerable edge, having won 56% of deciding sets, while Voelzke has not won any in the past year.
- In converting break points, Eqbal again shows superiority, executing 35.23% compared to Voelzke's 25.64%.
Editorial Prediction (July 15, 2025, UTC):
The comparative analysis reveals important aspects of each player's performance, pinpointing areas of strengths and weaknesses. Voelzke demonstrates better return statistics in recent form but struggles to maintain consistency in high-pressure situations and converting breakpoints.
Conversely, Eqbal holds a slight advantage in second serve points and showcases stronger overall match performance. Notably, Eqbal excels in saving breakpoints under pressure and has significantly better results in deciding sets.
Factoring in form, match stats, and surface preference, Eqbal appears poised to secure victory. Eqbal's prowess in critical moments and sustained success over the past year make them the likely winner in this matchup.
Ishaque Eqbal vs Gray Voelzke Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
I. Eqbal vs G. Voelzke H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:22:59 | Average Match Time | 1:22:59 |
| 65% (36/55) | 1st Serve % | 44% (24/54) |
| 72% (26/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (17/24) |
| 74% (14/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (14/30) |
| 100% (3/3) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/1) |
| 43% (23/54) | Return Points Win % | 27% (15/55) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
I. Eqbal Recent Matches Played
G. Voelzke Recent Matches Played

I. Eqbal vs G. Voelzke Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.07% (93/79) | YTD Win/Loss | 31.58% (12/26) |
| 53.30% (202/177) | Sets Win/Loss | 35.06% (27/50) |
| 51.96% (1843/1704) | Games Win/Loss | 45.76% (313/371) |
| 54.74% (75/62) | Hard Win/Loss | 40.00% (8/12) |
| 51.43% (18/17) | Clay Win/Loss | 26.67% (4/11) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 400 | Aces Total | 33 |
| 0.32 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 550 | Total Double Faults | 55 |
| 1:27:5 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 371.28 | Average Opponent Rank | 118.39 |
| 59% (5898/9914) | 1st Serve % | 49% (350/710) |
| 66% (3891/5898) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (239/350) |
| 47% (1907/4016) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (160/360) |
| 48% (485/1020) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (26/78) |
| 42% (4095/9700) | Return Points Win % | 39% (279/722) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 54.39% (93/78) | Futures W/L | 31.58% (12/26) |
| 54% (89/166) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 32% (12/37) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (21/41) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 20% (1/5) |
| 53% (20/38) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 88% (93/82) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (15/13) |
| 12% (93/11) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (15/2) |
| 14% (78/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (23/0) |